Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting a global score of 98 against 84.3. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a way older and way thicker cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but Samsung made it just a little lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. They have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and a bigger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a much tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same 24 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.