Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is way better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a 94.8 score against 78.3. The Galaxy S20 is a lighter device than vivo X70 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a better number of pixels per screen inch. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S20. Both have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a back camera with lot more MP and better video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.