Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, having a 94.8 score against 86.1. Galaxy S20's body is a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11, providing the user a couple additional features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features superior battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.