Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The Galaxy S21 FE design has the same thickness and weight than HTC U Ultra. The Galaxy S21 FE has just a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cores.
The HTC U Ultra features a little sharper screen than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. HTC U Ultra's camera is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's camera, and although the HTC U Ultra has worse 30 fps video frame rate, they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The HTC U Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S21 FE features a superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S21 FE not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the HTC U Ultra, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.