Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is much better than the LG V10, getting an 89.1 score against 78.6. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's construction is way newer, a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG V10.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a quite better performance than LG V10, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V10 counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
LG V10 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the LG V10 also has higher video frame rates and a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The LG V10 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a really longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V10. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG V10, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.