Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is slightly better than Moto G 5G, with a global score of 89.1 against 81.5. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE construction is newer, somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than Moto G 5G. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10.
Galaxy S21 FE features a bit more vivid display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Moto G 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.