Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.67 | 9.49 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-09-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Misty blue and Twilight orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 966.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has an overall score of 11.67, which is way better than Moto E7 Plus's 9.49 general score. Although Galaxy S21 Ultra and Moto E7 Plus were released with only 5 months difference, the Galaxy S21 Ultra body is a little thinner but also somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy S21 Ultra has newer 11 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, so it offers some extra features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a bit better processing power than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a way higher number of pixels per display inch, a quite larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a lot better camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and a camera with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S21 Ultra.