Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.67 | 9.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-04-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Blue and Turquoise |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 966.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is much better than Moto G8 Power Lite, with a 11.67 score against 9.3. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has the older 11 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra design is newer and just a bit thinner than the Moto G8 Power Lite's, although it's heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a way better display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a much greater pixels quantity per display inch and a little bigger screen. Galaxy S21 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments. Moto G8 Power Lite has just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra.
Galaxy S21 Ultra is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.