Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 966.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has an overall score of 98.1, which is way better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a thicker and heavier device than vivo X70 Pro. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should give identical OS features. The Galaxy S21 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a little bigger display and a better 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S21 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy S21 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 12 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.