Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 722.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 is better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a general score of 91.8 against 78.3. These phones use the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy S21 body has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it's just a little bit lighter. Vivo X70 Pro features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S21, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 features a much better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S21, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S21, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S21, because it has a 4450mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.