Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is heavier and thicker than Honor 50 Pro.
Honor 50 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 108 mega-pixels, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture. Honor 50 Pro has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.