Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. Although it's the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than vivo X70 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, so it provides the user some additional features.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a greater pixel number per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better battery performance than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 12 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.