Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is better than the Google Pixel 4, getting a score of 93.4 against 81.9. The Galaxy S22 is a a lot newer and a little bit thinner device than Google Pixel 4, although it is a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S22 has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy S22 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Galaxy S22 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.