Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 422 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a lot better than Honor Magic 6 Pro, with a 93.4 score against 76.6. The Galaxy S22 body is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version while Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a better screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, a just a bit worse pixel density and a quite smaller screen. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. The Galaxy S22 has just a bit better camera than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments and a tinier sensor shooting lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have a 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.