Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, getting a global score of 93.4 against 92.8. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12 version, offering a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Even when Samsung Galaxy S22 and the Motorola Edge 20 Pro were only released 6 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S22 is lighter and a bit thinner.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features greater battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.