Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 general score. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S22 body is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot more opaque screen, a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. The Galaxy S22 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images in poorly lited environments and a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have a camera in the back with a 50 mega pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has superior battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.