Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 422 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M51's 87.7 global score. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M51.
Galaxy S22 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger sensor taking better quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.