Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, counting with a lot of extra features. Although the Galaxy S22 and the vivo X70 Pro were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy S22 is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel number in each inch of display. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The vivo X70 Pro counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 20% larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have a same size back camera sensor and a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.