Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 500 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S23 Ultra's global score of 81.5. The iPhone 8 counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 8 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a way lower 750 x 1334 resolution, a much worse pixels number per inch in the display and a really smaller display. The Apple iPhone 8 has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra features a greater camera than iPhone 8, because it has a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a back camera with a way better 200 MP resolution. Galaxy S23 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.