Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S23 Ultra's 81.5 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13 version. The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel density and a little bit higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra features superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.