Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, getting a global score of 95.4 against 76. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. Even being the best in this review, Galaxy S22 Ultra is a thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less bright screen, it also counts with a little bigger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a greater pixels density. The Galaxy S24 FE and the Galaxy S22 Ultra have quite similar storage for applications and games, both have equal internal storage.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have a 8 GB RAM, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more CPU cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S24 FE, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.