Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than the Galaxy S24 Ultra, having an 88.1 score against 80.2. IPhone X counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436, a little bit smaller screen and a little less pixels per inch in the display. Apple iPhone X has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Galaxy S24 Ultra one, both have equal 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. The Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.