Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-07-12 |
| -- | 6.16 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.62 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, getting a 90.7 score against 77.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is notably thinner and noticeably lighter than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe. The Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe features a lot better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much sharper display than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a much better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a larger screen and more pixels per inch of display. Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a lot higher video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light environments, a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better 200 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.