Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| -- | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Google Pixel 3a, with a 90.7 score against 78.8. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is lighter and extremely thinner than the Google Pixel 3a.
The Google Pixel 3a features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit better pixel density, a larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher video quality, a lot better 200 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.