Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and extremely lighter device than the Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bit larger screen and a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bigger aperture, a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a camera with lot more MP and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.