Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having a 90.7 score against 82.9. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is way thinner and a lot lighter than Google Pixel 4a.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bigger display and a little better pixel density. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.