Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the HTC U Ultra, with a 90.7 score against 77. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is notably lighter and way thinner than the HTC U Ultra. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory. HTC U Ultra features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a much better video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.