Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-01 |
| -- | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the LG G7 ThinQ, with a general score of 90.7 against 81. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and thinner phone than LG G7 ThinQ.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 3088px resolution and a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with way more brightness and a little larger screen. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG G7 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.