Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| -- | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.14 ounces |
| -- | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than the LG K92, having a global score of 90.7 against 85.4. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is extremely thinner and a lot lighter than the LG K92. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version.
LG K92 features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking display than LG K92, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a higher display density and a bit larger screen.
The LG K92 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has superior battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than LG K92, because it has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video, a lot better video resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.