Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-09 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a global score of 90.7 against 82.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is way thinner and lighter than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite larger display.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.