Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is lighter and thinner than LG V35 ThinQ. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a brighter display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.