Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than the LG V40 ThinQ. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density and a little lower 1440 x 3088 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.