Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-20 |
| -- | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.72 ounces |
| -- | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having a 90.7 score against 87.6. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and incredibly lighter phone than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as the Galaxy S25 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.