Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with a 90.7 score against 87.1. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 14 operating system, so they should give you identical operating system features. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and much lighter device than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a greater pixels number in each screen inch, a bit brighter screen and a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a CPU that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's CPU, both of them have 8 processing cores and 12 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 0.77 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.