Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| -- | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G's global score of 81.5. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and way lighter phone than the Motorola Moto G 5G. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features and increased performance.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G 5G, because it has a better pixels density, a little bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G 5G has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better video resolution and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a battery duration that is just as good as the Galaxy S25 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.