Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-07-08 |
| -- | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Surfing blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having a overall score of 90.7 against 82.6. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is incredibly lighter and notably thinner than Moto G 5G Plus. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a little better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Moto G 5G Plus features a battery duration that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery lifetime. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.