Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-10 |
| -- | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 90.7 against 77.4. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a way better video quality, a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.