Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-16 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Action, getting a 90.7 score against 78.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola One Action. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better display than Motorola One Action, because it has a bit larger display, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola One Action counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Motorola One Action, because it has a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.