Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-04 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a general score of 90.7 against 79.8. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola One Hyper. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a better display pixels density, a little bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Motorola One Hyper has a greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a lot better video resolution, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.