Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-15 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Motorola One Vision. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a little more pixels per screen inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit larger display.
Motorola One Vision counts with a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a lot higher 200 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola One Vision features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.