Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Motorola razr (2020).
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a higher pixels number in each inch of display and a bit larger display. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Motorola razr (2020) feature incredibly similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.