Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-03 |
| -- | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Nokia 9 PureView, having a 90.7 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is a lot lighter and notably thinner than Nokia 9 PureView. The Nokia 9 PureView features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better looking display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a way bigger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.