Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-16 |
| -- | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is thinner and incredibly lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a quite larger screen and more pixels per inch of display. Nubia Red Magic 3S's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Galaxy S25 Ultra one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both have 12 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has faster video frame rate, a camera with much more megapixels and a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality photos and videos.
Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.