Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-02 |
| -- | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Sonic silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a global score of 90.7 against 76.2. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and a lot thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a greater count of pixels per display inch, a little bigger display and a way brighter screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little longer battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate, a way better 200 MP resolution camera and a larger aperture to take better low light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.