Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-21 |
| -- | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a overall score of 90.7 against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, so it offers some additional features.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a brighter display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a lot brighter display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bigger display.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo and Galaxy S25 Ultra both feature really similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.