Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-02 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Galaxy A30's 79.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and a lot lighter phone than Galaxy A30. Galaxy A30 has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a camera with lot more megapixels, a way better video resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A30, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.