Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-20 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Galaxy A30s's overall score of 79.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, providing you some nice extra features. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way lighter and much thinner cellphone than Galaxy A30s.
The Galaxy A30s counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger display and a lot higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy S25 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much better video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.