Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-27 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Galaxy A31's 81.3 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10, offering lots of additional features and increased performance. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and lighter phone than the Galaxy A31.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than Galaxy A31, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bit higher pixels density and a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a lot better resolution camera in the back, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low light images. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the Galaxy S25 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.