Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Galaxy A41's score of 81.7. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11, counting with lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly lighter and much thinner phone than Galaxy A41.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a just a little greater number of pixels in each display inch, a quite larger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy A41, because it has a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.