Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52's score of 90.7. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A52. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a little larger screen, a quite higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy A52 features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy A52, because it has a much bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution camera, a bigger aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.